Leading Criminal Procedure and Sentencing Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

245 reported cases · January 2023 to June 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Criminal Procedure and Sentencing?

Singapore courts issued 245 reported Criminal Procedure and Sentencing judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (175), of the 110 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (50), the median monetary award recorded was $10,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 245 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (43) · 2025 (62) · 2024 (67) · 2023 (73)
By court SGHC (175) · SGCA (64) · SGHCF (4) · SGDC (2)
Outcomes (110 parseable) Appeal dismissed (50) · Appeal allowed (17) · Sentence imposed (14) · Application dismissed (11) · Convicted (10) · Acquitted (4) · Application allowed (2) · Application granted (1) · Application refused (1)
Median monetary award $10,000 (across 5 awards)
Most active counsel Anandan Bala (8) · Sarah Siaw (8) · Wong Woon Kwong (8) · Ashvin Hariharan (6) · Chan Yi Cheng (6)

Compiled from 245 reported Criminal Procedure and Sentencing judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 245 reported Criminal Procedure and Sentencing judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to June 2026), Drew & Napier LLC is the most active firm by reported case count (11 cases), Wong Woon Kwong is the most active lawyer (10 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Criminal Procedure and Sentencing appears in 245 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Sentencing — Appeals (41), Sentencing (28) and Appeal (23). The most active judge by reported case count is Tay Yong Kwang (64 cases) and the most active firm is Drew & Napier LLC (11 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases in Singapore?

Drew & Napier LLC leads in Criminal Procedure and Sentencing with 11 cases between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Eugene Thuraisingam LLP (11 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (8 cases). 146 firms appeared in Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases during this period.

Who are the leading Criminal Procedure and Sentencing lawyers in Singapore?

Wong Woon Kwong is the most active Criminal Procedure and Sentencing lawyer in Singapore with 10 case appearances between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Suang Wijaya (9) and Anandan Bala (9).

Which judges handle the most Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases in Singapore?

Tay Yong Kwang has handled 64 Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases between January 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Vincent Hoong (53 cases) and Sundaresh Menon (49 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases are reported in Singapore courts?

245 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, most often decided by Tay Yong Kwang.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Criminal Procedure and Sentencing cases?

The main sub-topics are Sentencing — Appeals (41), Sentencing (28) and Appeal (23).

Case Volume by Year

73
23
67
24
62
25
43
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Stay of execution — Application under s 60G of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969 (2020 Rev Ed) for permission to make a post-appeal application in a capital case 2 cases

Sentencing — Applicability of mandatory minimum sentence to an attempt to commit the offence of aggravated statutory rape 2 cases

Key Statutes

cited in 162 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 148 cases
cited in 69 cases
cited in 30 cases
cited in 26 cases
cited in 23 cases
cited in 20 cases
Applications in Capital Cases Act
cited in 14 cases
cited in 14 cases
cited in 10 cases
cited in 10 cases
Criminal Justice Reform Act
cited in 8 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 6 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 1 of 10
[2026] SGDC 210
PP v Yeo Chee Hong
26 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 118
PAULUS TANNOS v Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore
29 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 114
GE ZHI v ATTORNEY-GENERAL
26 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 116
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v GARRICK ENG KWAN MENG
26 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 115
ANKIT SHARMA v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
25 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 113
JEH v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
22 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 110
GALVEZ MARY JOE BLANCO v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
21 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 107
LING ZHAO BIN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
18 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGCA 25
Lian Hoe Heng v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
12 May 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHC 98
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Hossain Mohammad Azim
8 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 99
HABEEB ZALEENA D/O PALLIVILAKAM KADER HABEEB MOHAMED v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
8 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 158
Public Prosecutor v. Yap Yeong Keen
5 May 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 95
HO HUI MIN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
5 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 92
LIAO NUOQIAN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
30 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 89
KENNETH LUM HSIEN LOONG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
29 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 90
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v TAN SHAY HOWE
29 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGCA 21
Chong Hoon Cheong v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
28 April 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHC 88
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v CHAN JUN HONG
27 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 87
TAN KHENG YEOW (CHEN QINGYAO) v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
23 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 85
SONG CHAO v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
16 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGCA 18
Omar Bin Yacob Bamadhaj v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
15 April 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGCA 17
AFFANDI BIN MOHAMED HASSAN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
14 April 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHC 80
TRAN THI TIEN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
10 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 72
VICTOR FOO SEANG KWANG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 64
SANTOS-TUMALIP MARIA MONALYN BAGAPORO v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
25 March 2026
SGHC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. The Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the firm and lawyer lists because it appears as the public prosecutor, not as engaged defence counsel. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.