Leading Damages Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
92 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Damages?
Singapore courts issued 92 reported Damages judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (47), of the 24 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal allowed (14), the median monetary award recorded was $2,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 92 reported Damages judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 92 reported Damages judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Allen & Gledhill LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (10 cases), Koh Keh Jang Fendrick is the most active lawyer (6 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Damages appears in 92 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Assessment (40), Measure of damages — Personal injuries cases (7) and Special damages (5). The most active judge by reported case count is Woo Bih Li (9 cases) and the most active firm is Allen & Gledhill LLP (10 cases).
Which law firms handle the most Damages cases in Singapore?
Allen & Gledhill LLP leads in Damages with 10 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (8 cases) and Oon & Bazul LLP (5 cases). 103 firms appeared in Damages cases during this period.
Who are the leading Damages lawyers in Singapore?
Koh Keh Jang Fendrick is the most active Damages lawyer in Singapore with 6 case appearances between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Tay Boon Chong Willy (5) and Fernandez Christopher (4).
Which judges handle the most Damages cases in Singapore?
Woo Bih Li has handled 9 Damages cases between January 2023 and October 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Steven Chong (9 cases) and See Kee Oon (6 cases) are also among the most active.
How many Damages cases are reported in Singapore courts?
92 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Damages, most often decided by Woo Bih Li.
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Damages cases?
The main sub-topics are Assessment (40), Measure of damages — Personal injuries cases (7) and Special damages (5).
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Assessment 40 cases
Measure of damages — Personal injuries cases 7 cases
Special damages 5 cases
Mitigation — Tort 4 cases
Liquidated damages or penalty 4 cases
Remoteness 4 cases
Quantum 4 cases
Compensation and damages 4 cases
Measure of damages — Contract 3 cases
Rules in awarding — Proof of actual damage 2 cases
Measure of damages — Tort 2 cases
Assessment — Defamation — Principles applicable to determination of appropriate quantum of damages 2 cases
Measure of damages — Tort — Reliance measure of damages for tort of deceit 2 cases
Measure of damages — Personal injury cases 2 cases
Assessment — Defamation 2 cases
Measure of damages — Personal Injuries cases 2 cases
Practice and procedure 2 cases
Measure of damages — Contract — Damages for misdelivery of cargo 2 cases
Mitigation — Contract 2 cases
Computation 2 cases
Measure of damages — Contract for provision of services — Diminution in value 1 case
Measure of damages 1 case
Appeals 1 case
Apportionment — Contribution 1 case
Liquidated damages or penalty — Whether a clause providing for the absolute forfeiture of a security deposit amounts to a penalty 1 case
Rules in awarding — Rule against double recovery — Whether Claimant’s usage of government grant to pay for migrant domestic worker’s caregiving course was recoverable as damages 1 case
Measure of damages — Personal injuries case — Assessment of injuries attributable to accident — Whether accident caused aggravation of pre-existing degenerative conditions — Whether accident caused psychiatric injuries 1 case
Measure of damages — Dependency claims for death caused by wrongful act — Application of actuarial tables to dependency claims 1 case
Practice and procedure — Plaintiff partially compensated by other parties out of court — Whether claim should be barred because of risk of double recovery 1 case
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
Page 1 of 4Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.