Leading Civil Procedure Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

466 reported cases · January 2023 to June 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Civil Procedure?

Singapore courts issued 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (242), of the 127 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (39), the median monetary award recorded was $16,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 466 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (81) · 2025 (117) · 2024 (125) · 2023 (143)
By court SGHC (242) · SGHCR (76) · SGHC(I) (40) · SGHC(A) (39) · SGCA (32) · SGDC (15) · SGHCF (10) · SGCA(I) (6) · SGMC (4) · SGFC (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (127 parseable) Appeal dismissed (39) · Appeal allowed (37) · Application dismissed (32) · Application allowed (7) · Application granted (4) · Claim dismissed (4) · Claim allowed (2) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1) · Judgment for the respondent (1)
Median monetary award $16,000 (across 12 awards)
Most active counsel Charlene Wee Swee Ting (9) · Thio Shen Yi (9) · Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen (8) · Ong Boon Hwee William (8) · T Abirami (8)

Compiled from 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to June 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (61 cases), Thio Shen Yi is the most active lawyer (13 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Civil Procedure appears in 466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (45 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (61 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Civil Procedure with 61 cases between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (52 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (44 cases). 293 firms appeared in Civil Procedure cases during this period.

Who are the leading Civil Procedure lawyers in Singapore?

Thio Shen Yi is the most active Civil Procedure lawyer in Singapore with 13 case appearances between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (11) and Charlene Wee Swee Ting (10).

Which judges handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 45 Civil Procedure cases between January 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Choo Han Teck (41 cases) and Steven Chong (26 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Civil Procedure cases are reported in Singapore courts?

466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Civil Procedure, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Civil Procedure cases?

The main sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14).

Case Volume by Year

143
23
125
24
117
25
81
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 106 cases
cited in 57 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 50 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 49 cases
cited in 48 cases
cited in 45 cases
cited in 41 cases
cited in 29 cases
cited in 23 cases
cited in 18 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 8 cases
Trustees Act (Cap 337)
cited in 7 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 2 of 19
[2026] SGHCR 14
Daniel Seng Hock Chye v Denso International Asia Pte Ltd
11 May 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHCR 13
GOH CHIN CHENG v CHOCO UP SG PTE LTD
4 May 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGDC 155
MPM CAPITAL PTE. LTD. v DESPACE PROJECT AND DESIGN PTE. LTD. & Anor
4 May 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 94
MATTHEW BENJAMIN CAPE V JOHN CHARLES COLLIS & 8 ORS
30 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 91
JASON ALEKSANDER KARDACHI & Anor v DEEPAK MISHRA & 3 Ors
30 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 150
HONG SEH MOTORS PTE LTD v RYNENATION PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors
29 April 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGMC 53
Furama Hotel Singapore Pte Ltd v Ng Siew Moy
28 April 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGHC(I) 4
DVA & Anor v DVC
24 April 2026
SGHC(I)
[2026] SGMC 52
WEN HANRONG v HUATIONG CONTRACTOR PTE LTD & Anor
24 April 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGHC 86
Wang Meiping v Huang Yilong
23 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGFC 58
YCD v YCE
23 April 2026
SGFC
[2026] SGHC(A) 11
VIETJET AVIATION JOINT STOCK COMPANY v FW AVIATION (HOLDINGS) 1 LIMITED
21 April 2026
SGHC(A)
[2026] SGHC(A) 10
Chan Swee Lean & Anor v LLS CAPITAL PTE LTD
16 April 2026
SGHC(A)
[2026] SGHCR 12
Teo Han Siang v Lim Eng Keong
15 April 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 79
AQUILO SHIPPING INC v SRTT MARINE TRADING & SERVICES PTE LTD
10 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 76
Ever Strategy Consultants Limited v PSA International Pte. Ltd. & 11 Ors
9 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 66
BABBOBOX PTE. LTD. v EPIQ SINGAPORE PTE. LTD.
8 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHCR 9
Zyfas Medical Co (Sued as a firm) v Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. & Anor
7 April 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHCR 10
Michal Beranek v Sreerangam Muruthi & 2 Ors
6 April 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 65
Vanbo Investments Pte Ltd v ph. AG & Anor
25 March 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 102
ANDY TAN POH WENG v JEE LEE
24 March 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 100
HO REI, JETHRO & Anor v CHU JIAT BOON TIMOTHY
18 March 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC(A) 8
Balbeer Singh Mangat & Anor v TEMBUSU GROWTH FUND III LTD & 5 Ors
18 March 2026
SGHC(A)
[2026] SGDC 97
JFE v JFF
16 March 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHCR 7
ZHANG XIN v LIU YINGKUI
16 March 2026
SGHCR

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.