Leading Contract Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

255 reported cases · January 2023 to October 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Contract?

Singapore courts issued 255 reported Contract judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (159), of the 61 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (19), the median monetary award recorded was $72,500. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 255 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (72) · 2025 (54) · 2024 (56) · 2023 (73)
By court SGHC (159) · SGHC(A) (27) · SGDC (24) · SGCA (12) · SGHC(I) (9) · SGSCT (9) · SGMC (7) · SGCA(I) (4) · SGHCR (4)
Outcomes (61 parseable) Appeal dismissed (19) · Claim dismissed (16) · Appeal allowed (15) · Application dismissed (5) · Claim allowed (4) · Application granted (1) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1)
Median monetary award $72,500 (across 6 awards)
Most active counsel Koh Swee Yen (7) · Lok Vi Ming (6) · Cavinder Bull (4) · Cheng Wai Yuen Mark (4) · Chew Kei-Jin (4)

Compiled from 255 reported Contract judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 255 reported Contract judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to October 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (31 cases), Koh Swee Yen is the most active lawyer (7 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Contract appears in 255 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Breach (62), Contractual terms (20) and Remedies — Damages (18). The most active judge by reported case count is Woo Bih Li (19 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (31 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Contract cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Contract with 31 cases between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (25 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (22 cases). 248 firms appeared in Contract cases during this period.

Who are the leading Contract lawyers in Singapore?

Koh Swee Yen is the most active Contract lawyer in Singapore with 7 case appearances between January 2023 and October 2026, followed by Lok Vi Ming (6) and Cheng Wai Yuen Mark (4).

Which judges handle the most Contract cases in Singapore?

Woo Bih Li has handled 19 Contract cases between January 2023 and October 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Kannan Ramesh (16 cases) and Goh Yihan (14 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Contract cases are reported in Singapore courts?

255 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Contract, most often decided by Woo Bih Li.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Contract cases?

The main sub-topics are Breach (62), Contractual terms (20) and Remedies — Damages (18).

Case Volume by Year

73
23
56
24
54
25
72
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 63 cases
cited in 37 cases
cited in 26 cases
Misrepresentation Act
cited in 16 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 16 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 16 cases
cited in 14 cases
cited in 12 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 6 cases
Unfair Contract Terms Act
cited in 6 cases
cited in 4 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 4 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 1 of 11
[2026] SGHC 198
NPS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL PTE. LTD. v RAFFLES ASSETS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
14 October 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 329
Fagumuda v Oktay Sahin
13 October 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGSCT 27
JGY v JHH
12 October 2026
SGSCT
[2026] SGHC(A) 25
TUFFI (PTE.) LTD. v TECHKON PTE LTD & Anor
8 October 2026
SGHC(A)
[2026] SGDC 328
Jason Yan Zixiang v James Fong Jing Xiong
5 October 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 202
STAMFORD LAND CORPORATION LTD v UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LIMITED
29 September 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 302
PRIME LODGE (2021) PTE. LTD. v UNITED LAUNDRY PTE. LTD.
28 September 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 196
TEOW SEOK PHEN v CHEE WEI JUN
24 September 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGSCT 23
JKN v JKO
17 September 2026
SGSCT
[2026] SGHC 185
Chander Agarwal v Lee Xiu Hui Felicia
9 September 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 276
CAI YANHONG v PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE COMPANY SINGAPORE
3 September 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 277
NGAI NAI PING JANGO v BANSHING INDUSTRIAL CO., (PTE) LTD.
1 September 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 175
Reformd Pte Ltd v Kopigi Pte Ltd
28 August 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC(A) 22
Shipworks Engineering Pte Ltd and another v Sembcorp Marine Integrated Yard Pte Ltd and another and another appeal
27 August 2026
SGHC(A)
[2026] SGDC 272
Tan Seng Kiat v Lim Kim Wee Nigel
25 August 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 169
OON KOON CHENG & ANOR v LI HUA
18 August 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 166
Sea-Dragon Marine Services Pte Ltd v Mansoor s/o Tayabbhai Gandhi & Anor
14 August 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 260
UNDERWATER DIVING OPERATORS PTE LTD v DUNDEE MARINE & INDUSTRIAL SERVICES PTE LTD
11 August 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHCR 30
DA HUI SHIPPING (PTE) LTD (IN CREDITORS' VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION) v SHOOK LIN & BOK LLP
3 August 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 161
Chang Yiuw Choon & 6 Ors v Chong Yiuw Tham & Anor
31 July 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 153
LAM, KIN HING KENNETH v YUNG, MAN TUNG
21 July 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 232
Stamford Land Management Pte Ltd v Nur Aniza binte Mohd Shah
17 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 149
RIPPLE MARKETS APAC PTE. LTD. v I-REMIT, INC. & 2 Ors
16 July 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGCA 33
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP v HIN LEONG TRADING (PTE.) LTD (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION)
16 July 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGSCT 21
JJA v JJB
14 July 2026
SGSCT

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.