Arbitration

57 cases · January 2025 to June 2026

Overview

Arbitration is a major practice area in Singapore litigation, with 45 reported judgments between January 2025 to February 2026. Cases were heard across the High Court (General Division) (28), the Singapore International Commercial Court (26), the Court of Appeal (19). The most frequently litigated sub-topics were Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside (13), Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Breach of natural justice (4), Enforcement — Foreign award (3), Arbitrability and public policy (2).

The most active judges in arbitration cases were Steven Chong (11), Sundaresh Menon (10), Andre Maniam (7). Leading firms by case volume included WongPartnership LLP (11), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (11), Providence Law Asia LLC (6). The most frequently appearing lawyers were Koh Swee Yen (5), Thio Shen Yi (4), Ashish Chugh (3). Other sub-topics included Award — Recourse against award — Breach of natural justice, Stay of court proceedings — Whether grounds of disputed debt within scope of arbitration agreement, Sections 4 and 5 Arbitration (International Investment Disputes) Act 1968, Recognition and enforcement — Award under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States.

Data coverage: between January 2025 to February 2026

Which law firms handle the most Arbitration cases in Singapore?

WongPartnership LLP leads in arbitration with 11 cases between January 2025 to February 2026, followed by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (11 cases) and Providence Law Asia LLC (6 cases). 47 firms appeared in arbitration cases during this period.

Who are the leading Arbitration lawyers in Singapore?

Koh Swee Yen is the most active arbitration lawyer in Singapore with 5 case appearances between January 2025 to February 2026, followed by Thio Shen Yi (4) and Ashish Chugh (3). 231 lawyers appeared in arbitration cases during this period.

Which judges handle the most Arbitration cases in Singapore?

Steven Chong has handled 11 cases in arbitration between January 2025 to February 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Sundaresh Menon (10 cases) and Andre Maniam (7 cases) are also among the most active. 31 judges heard arbitration cases.

How many arbitration cases are heard in Singapore courts?

Between January 2025 to February 2026, 45 reported judgments involved arbitration in Singapore courts. The majority were heard in the High Court (General Division) (28 cases).

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore arbitration cases?

The main sub-topics in Singapore arbitration litigation between January 2025 to February 2026 were Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside (13 cases), Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Breach of natural justice (4 cases), Enforcement — Foreign award (3 cases), Arbitrability and public policy (2 cases).

Is arbitration a common area of litigation in Singapore?

Yes. Arbitration is the 8th most litigated practice area out of 42 tracked, accounting for 7.0% of the 642 reported judgments between January 2025 to February 2026. Key sub-topics include Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside, Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Breach of natural justice, Enforcement — Foreign award.

Case Volume by Year

39
25
18
26
2025–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside 14 Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Breach of natural justice 5 Arbitrability and public policy 3 Enforcement — Foreign award 3 Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Whether tribunal breached natural justice by depriving party of reasonable opportunity to respond to case against it 2 Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Jurisdiction 2 Award — Recourse against award — Remission 2 Award — Recourse against award — Breach of natural justice 2 Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Whether tribunal’s decision was not in accordance with the arbitral procedure agreed by the parties 1 Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Whether award in conflict with public policy of Singapore under Art 34(2)(b)(ii) UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration — International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A, 2020 Rev Ed) 1 Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Destruction of evidence uncovered during arbitration —Tribunal refusing application to strike out claims — Whether enforcement of award contrary to public policy of Singapore — Section 31(4)(b) International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Tribunal making detailed orders for specific performance — Parties not consulted on terms of order for specific performance — Whether award was rendered in breach of natural justice — Section 31(2)(c) International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Arbitration claimant allegedly raising new quantum case — Arbitration respondents addressing new quantum case on merits — Tribunal accepting new quantum case — Whether arbitration respondents precluded from seeking to set aside the enforcement order 1 Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Tribunal making detailed orders for specific performance — Parties not consulted on terms of order for specific performance — Whether tribunal decided on matters beyond scope of submission to arbitration — Section 31(2)(d) International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Destruction of evidence uncovered during arbitration — Tribunal refusing to draw certain adverse inferences — Whether tribunal failed to consider arguments raised — Whether award was rendered in breach of natural justice — Section 31(2)(c) International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 Injunction — Court’s powers under section 12A International Arbitration Act 1994 1 Agreement 1 Agreement — Governing law 1 Enforcement — Singapore award 1 Conflict of laws — Governing law of underlying contract 1 + 58 more

Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Whether tribunal breached natural justice by depriving party of reasonable opportunity to respond to case against it 2 cases

Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Whether tribunal’s decision was not in accordance with the arbitral procedure agreed by the parties 1 case

Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Whether award in conflict with public policy of Singapore under Art 34(2)(b)(ii) UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration — International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A, 2020 Rev Ed) 1 case

Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Destruction of evidence uncovered during arbitration —Tribunal refusing application to strike out claims — Whether enforcement of award contrary to public policy of Singapore — Section 31(4)(b) International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case

Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Tribunal making detailed orders for specific performance — Parties not consulted on terms of order for specific performance — Whether award was rendered in breach of natural justice — Section 31(2)(c) International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case

Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Arbitration claimant allegedly raising new quantum case — Arbitration respondents addressing new quantum case on merits — Tribunal accepting new quantum case — Whether arbitration respondents precluded from seeking to set aside the enforcement order 1 case

Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Tribunal making detailed orders for specific performance — Parties not consulted on terms of order for specific performance — Whether tribunal decided on matters beyond scope of submission to arbitration — Section 31(2)(d) International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case

Enforcement — Foreign award — Application to set aside enforcement order — Destruction of evidence uncovered during arbitration — Tribunal refusing to draw certain adverse inferences — Whether tribunal failed to consider arguments raised — Whether award was rendered in breach of natural justice — Section 31(2)(c) International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case

Injunction — Court’s powers under section 12A International Arbitration Act 1994 1 case

Conflict of laws — Governing law of underlying contract 1 case

Conflict of laws — Governing law of arbitration agreement 1 case

Enforcement — Foreign award — Whether s 6(3) of the Limitation Act 1959 (2020 Rev Ed) applied 1 case

Enforcement — Foreign award — Whether award debtor could argue that underlying claims in the arbitration were time-barred 1 case

Enforcement — Foreign award — Whether action to enforce an award was time barred under s 6(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1959 (2020 Rev Ed) 1 case

Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Infra petita challenge 1 case

Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Whether failure to comply with pre-arbitration procedures went to admissibility or jurisdiction 1 case

Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Jurisdiction — Whether proper party to arbitration agreement 1 case

Sections 4 and 5 Arbitration (International Investment Disputes) Act 1968 1 case

Recognition and enforcement — Award under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 54 cases
cited in 51 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 5 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 4 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 4 cases
State Immunity Act
cited in 4 cases
cited in 4 cases
cited in 3 cases
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
Indian Contract Act
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
Foreign States Immunities Act
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 3 of 3