Leading Tort Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

150 reported cases · January 2023 to July 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Tort?

Singapore courts issued 150 reported Tort judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (95), of the 44 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Claim dismissed (23), the median monetary award recorded was $50,625. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 150 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (38) · 2025 (43) · 2024 (34) · 2023 (35)
By court SGHC (95) · SGDC (22) · SGHC(A) (8) · SGMC (8) · SGCA (7) · SGHC(I) (4) · SGCA(I) (2) · SGCDT (2) · SGHCR (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (44 parseable) Claim dismissed (23) · Appeal dismissed (10) · Appeal allowed (8) · Application dismissed (1) · Claim allowed (1) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1)
Median monetary award $50,625 (across 6 awards)

Compiled from 150 reported Tort judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 150 reported Tort judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to July 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (15 cases), Lin Hui Yin Sharon is the most active lawyer (4 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Tort appears in 150 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit (25), Conspiracy (24) and Misrepresentation — Negligent misrepresentation (18). The most active judge by reported case count is Steven Chong (9 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (15 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Tort cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Tort with 15 cases between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (13 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (10 cases). 179 firms appeared in Tort cases during this period.

Who are the leading Tort lawyers in Singapore?

Lin Hui Yin Sharon is the most active Tort lawyer in Singapore with 4 case appearances between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Luo Ling Ling (3) and Saadhvika Jayanth (3).

Which judges handle the most Tort cases in Singapore?

Steven Chong has handled 9 Tort cases between January 2023 and July 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Mohamed Faizal (8 cases) and Belinda Ang Saw Ean (7 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Tort cases are reported in Singapore courts?

150 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Tort, most often decided by Steven Chong.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Tort cases?

The main sub-topics are Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit (25), Conspiracy (24) and Misrepresentation — Negligent misrepresentation (18).

Case Volume by Year

35
23
34
24
43
25
38
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 45 cases
cited in 17 cases
cited in 14 cases
Misrepresentation Act
cited in 12 cases
Defamation Act
cited in 9 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 5 cases
cited in 4 cases
cited in 4 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 4 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 4 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 3 cases
COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act
cited in 3 cases
Contributory Negligence and Personal Injuries Act
cited in 3 cases

Guides & Data

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 2 of 6
[2026] SGDC 47
WEE SOON WAH v SYN CHEVOR CHEE MENG TROY ANTHONY
29 January 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGMC 1
STEPHEN TAN HOCK SAN v CHAN YEOK PHENG & Anor
27 January 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGDC 37
CLARENCE LUN YAODONG v TAN CHIN AIK JOSEPH
23 January 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGMC 12
HUTTONS ASIA PTE LTD v OH MY SUITES PTE LTD
23 January 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGDC 33
HVS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED v VINOD EASHWAR
21 January 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 15
Prashant Mudgal v SAP Asia Pte. Ltd.
21 January 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 14
GC LEASE SINGAPORE PTE. LTD. v FONBELL SOLUTION PTE. LTD. & 7 Ors
20 January 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 1
ALICIA TAN GEK CHENG v POK VIC SENT
19 January 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 5
TERRENCE FERNANDEZ v TAN AIK HONG THOMAS
16 January 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGCA 1
Valency International Pte Ltd v JSW International Tradecorp Pte Ltd & 2 Ors
12 January 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHC 7
PARVATY D/O RAJU & Anor v NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (S) PTE LTD & Anor
12 January 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 2
KANAN PACKRISAMY V HERBAL PHARM PTE. LTD. & 3 ORS
6 January 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGMC 3
WEN HANRONG v HUATIONG CONTRACTOR PTE LTD & Anor
5 January 2026
SGMC
[2025] SGDC 331
UDDIN MOHAMMAD ZOSIM v CES ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTE.LTD.
30 December 2025
SGDC
[2025] SGHC 266
FirstCom Academy Pte Ltd v Oom Academy Pte Ltd & 3 Ors
30 December 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 258
LEE HSUEH CHING @ FIONA LEE SARGEANT & Anor v LOH KIA HUI
22 December 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGDC 325
Yip Kie Sie v Denis Lim Boon Jin & Anor
19 December 2025
SGDC
[2025] SGHC 254
JEFF LIM WAI KIT v ARUMUGAM ALAMUTHU
15 December 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGDC 318
CHAN KONG THOE v TRICILIA TANG PEI LU
10 December 2025
SGDC
[2025] SGDC 312
BAEK JONGWOO v JOHN S/O SUSARETNAM
4 December 2025
SGDC
[2025] SGHC 241
Guy Carpenter & Company Private Limited v Choi Okmi & 3 Ors
3 December 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGCA(I) 3
VIRGILIO TARRAGO DA SILVEIRA & Anor v HASHSTACS PTE. LTD. & Anor
26 November 2025
SGCA(I)
[2025] SGMC 72
FEDERAL FIRE ENGINEERING PTE LTD v EIGEN E&C PTE. LTD. & Anor
25 November 2025
SGMC
[2025] SGHC 221
GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee
7 November 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGCA 51
POP HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. v Teo Ban Lim & 3 Ors
16 October 2025
SGCA

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.