Leading Contract Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

226 reported cases · January 2023 to July 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Contract?

Singapore courts issued 226 reported Contract judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (147), of the 55 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (19), the median monetary award recorded was $72,500. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 226 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (43) · 2025 (54) · 2024 (56) · 2023 (73)
By court SGHC (147) · SGHC(A) (25) · SGDC (16) · SGCA (11) · SGHC(I) (9) · SGMC (7) · SGCA(I) (4) · SGSCT (4) · SGHCR (3)
Outcomes (55 parseable) Appeal dismissed (19) · Appeal allowed (14) · Claim dismissed (13) · Application dismissed (5) · Claim allowed (2) · Application granted (1) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1)
Median monetary award $72,500 (across 6 awards)
Most active counsel Chew Kei-Jin (3) · Devathas Satianathan (3) · Kiran Jessica Makwana (3) · Koh Swee Yen (3) · Lee Eng Beng (3)

Compiled from 226 reported Contract judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 226 reported Contract judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to July 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (29 cases), Koh Swee Yen is the most active lawyer (6 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Contract appears in 226 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Breach (49), Contractual terms (15) and Formation (13). The most active judge by reported case count is Woo Bih Li (17 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (29 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Contract cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Contract with 29 cases between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (24 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (20 cases). 230 firms appeared in Contract cases during this period.

Who are the leading Contract lawyers in Singapore?

Koh Swee Yen is the most active Contract lawyer in Singapore with 6 case appearances between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Lok Vi Ming (5) and Cheng Wai Yuen Mark (4).

Which judges handle the most Contract cases in Singapore?

Woo Bih Li has handled 17 Contract cases between January 2023 and July 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Kannan Ramesh (14 cases) and Goh Yihan (14 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Contract cases are reported in Singapore courts?

226 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Contract, most often decided by Woo Bih Li.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Contract cases?

The main sub-topics are Breach (49), Contractual terms (15) and Formation (13).

Case Volume by Year

73
23
56
24
54
25
43
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 56 cases
cited in 34 cases
cited in 24 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 15 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 15 cases
cited in 13 cases
Misrepresentation Act
cited in 11 cases
cited in 10 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 5 cases
cited in 4 cases
Unfair Contract Terms Act
cited in 4 cases
Moneylenders Act
cited in 4 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 1 of 10
[2026] SGDC 215
WENDY DANUBRATA v J+F PRIVATE LIMITED & Anor
2 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 213
THIRUNAVUKARASU MANIKAM v GUMANAN S/O NALLATHAMBI & 3 Ors
1 July 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC(A) 19
FULL SUPPORT HEALTHCARE LIMITED v SMART GLOVE INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD.
29 June 2026
SGHC(A)
[2026] SGHC(I) 8
IntraWorks Strategic Fund I, LP & 3 Ors v Prisma AI Corporation Pte Ltd & Anor
25 June 2026
SGHC(I)
[2026] SGHC 126
EQUATION RECYCLING PTE. LTD. v LEADING BIO-ENERGY (S) PTE. LTD.
15 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGMC 71
PS 23 Interior Pte. Ltd. v Andrew Tan Tong Sin
12 June 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGHC(A) 17
DEEPAK MISHRA & Anor v RASHMI BOTHRA
5 June 2026
SGHC(A)
[2026] SGHC 117
LEOW HOCK SOON & Anor v CHEW EIK KHOON & 2 Ors
26 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 174
TAH LI THONG FOAM INDUSTRY v FURNITURE & FURNISHINGS PTE LTD
22 May 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 151
AP MEDIA PTE. LTD. v MOTOR IMAGE ENTERPRISES PTE LTD
5 May 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGMC 56
See Kok Eng v Eng Sieh Mei
4 May 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGHC 94
MATTHEW BENJAMIN CAPE V JOHN CHARLES COLLIS & 8 ORS
30 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 150
HONG SEH MOTORS PTE LTD v RYNENATION PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors
29 April 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGMC 51
CARE BEYOND PTE. LTD. v DEXTERITY MEDICAL & TRANSPORT SERVICES PTE LTD
20 April 2026
SGMC
[2026] SGSCT 2
JFL v JFM
13 April 2026
SGSCT
[2026] SGHCR 11
Low Jun Hong & 5 Ors v Hong Qi Yu & Anor
10 April 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 79
AQUILO SHIPPING INC v SRTT MARINE TRADING & SERVICES PTE LTD
10 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 81
SHIJU VARGHESE JOYCE & Anor v KIDNEY THERAPEUTICS CENTRE PTE. LTD. & Anor
10 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 76
Ever Strategy Consultants Limited v PSA International Pte. Ltd. & 11 Ors
9 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 74
Create the Future LP & Anor v Pirate Studios Pte. Ltd. & 2 Ors
7 April 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGSCT 1
XSQ v LLD
7 April 2026
SGSCT
[2026] SGSCT 5
JFT & Anor v JFV
6 April 2026
SGSCT
[2026] SGHC 70
STEVEN KURNIAWAN PRAYITNO v OH CHIN ANN & 2 Ors
31 March 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 54
Neo San San Cecilia v Loh Soo Chuan
11 March 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGMC 33
Broadley Engineering Pte. Ltd. v Award Engineering Pte. Ltd. & Anor
9 March 2026
SGMC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.