Leading Tort Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

150 reported cases · January 2023 to July 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Tort?

Singapore courts issued 150 reported Tort judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (95), of the 44 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Claim dismissed (23), the median monetary award recorded was $50,625. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 150 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (38) · 2025 (43) · 2024 (34) · 2023 (35)
By court SGHC (95) · SGDC (22) · SGHC(A) (8) · SGMC (8) · SGCA (7) · SGHC(I) (4) · SGCA(I) (2) · SGCDT (2) · SGHCR (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (44 parseable) Claim dismissed (23) · Appeal dismissed (10) · Appeal allowed (8) · Application dismissed (1) · Claim allowed (1) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1)
Median monetary award $50,625 (across 6 awards)

Compiled from 150 reported Tort judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 150 reported Tort judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to July 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (15 cases), Lin Hui Yin Sharon is the most active lawyer (4 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Tort appears in 150 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit (25), Conspiracy (24) and Misrepresentation — Negligent misrepresentation (18). The most active judge by reported case count is Steven Chong (9 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (15 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Tort cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Tort with 15 cases between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (13 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (10 cases). 179 firms appeared in Tort cases during this period.

Who are the leading Tort lawyers in Singapore?

Lin Hui Yin Sharon is the most active Tort lawyer in Singapore with 4 case appearances between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Luo Ling Ling (3) and Saadhvika Jayanth (3).

Which judges handle the most Tort cases in Singapore?

Steven Chong has handled 9 Tort cases between January 2023 and July 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Mohamed Faizal (8 cases) and Belinda Ang Saw Ean (7 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Tort cases are reported in Singapore courts?

150 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Tort, most often decided by Steven Chong.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Tort cases?

The main sub-topics are Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit (25), Conspiracy (24) and Misrepresentation — Negligent misrepresentation (18).

Case Volume by Year

35
23
34
24
43
25
38
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 45 cases
cited in 17 cases
cited in 14 cases
Misrepresentation Act
cited in 12 cases
Defamation Act
cited in 9 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 5 cases
cited in 4 cases
cited in 4 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 4 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 4 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 3 cases
COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act
cited in 3 cases
Contributory Negligence and Personal Injuries Act
cited in 3 cases

Guides & Data

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 4 of 6
[2025] SGHC 54
Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan
28 March 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGDC 77
JA'AFAR BIN ABDUL SAMAD v LIM ZHEN XIANG
20 March 2025
SGDC
[2025] SGCA 10
CIX v DGN
13 March 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHC 14
VIBRANT GROUP LIMITED v TONG CHI HO & Anor
27 January 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 13
ATT SYSTEMS (S’PORE) PTE LTD & Anor v CENTRICORE (S) PTE. LTD. & 7 Ors
23 January 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 4
Jonathan William Glassberg v UBS AG, SINGAPORE BRANCH
10 January 2025
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 330
CHIANG AI LING (JIANG AILING) v TAN KIAN CHYE & Anor
30 December 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 324
CONCORDE SERVICES PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) V ONG KIM HOCK & ANOR
17 December 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC(I) 32
VIRGILIO TARRAGO DA SILVEIRA & Anor v HASHSTACS PTE. LTD. & Anor
16 December 2024
SGHC(I)
[2024] SGHC 322
SW TRUSTEES PRIVATE LIMITED (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION) & Anor v TEODROS ASHENAFI TESEMMA & 5 Ors
16 December 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 311
DANIEL MAAG & Anor v LALIT KUMAR MODI
5 December 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 293
PROMETHEUS MARINE PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) v ALAN JOHN PICKERING & 2 Ors
19 November 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 286
FARM TO FORK SDN BHD v ADAMAS SG PTE LTD & Anor
14 November 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 289
Kapital Fund SPC v Lee Tze Wee, Andrew & Anor
7 November 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 279
ASIA-EURO CAPITAL SPV I LLP v REGULUS ADVISORS PTE LTD & 3 Ors
30 October 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 277
Tembusu Growth Fund III Ltd v Balbeer Singh Mangat & Anor
28 October 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 249
DURAIRAJ SANTIRAN v SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED
18 October 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 253
Xia Zheng v Lee King Anne
7 October 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC(A) 29
RAJESH HARICHANDRA BUDHRANI v INTL FCSTONE PTE LTD & 2 Ors
24 September 2024
SGHC(A)
[2024] SGHC(A) 26
SEATRIUM NEW ENERGY LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS KEPPEL FELS LIMITED) v HJ SHIPBUILDING & CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD.
16 September 2024
SGHC(A)
[2024] SGHC 237
3D NETWORKS SINGAPORE PTE LTD v VOON SOUTH SHIONG & Anor
16 September 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 212
CHOO YEW LIANG SEBASTIAN v KOH YEW TECK
19 August 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC(A) 23
CHAN PIK SUN v WAN HOE KEET (WEN HAOJIE) & 3 Ors
7 August 2024
SGHC(A)
[2024] SGHC 181
TAN CHENG CHENG & 2 Ors v SHAMLAL S/O TUPPANI BISAYSAR & Anor
12 July 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 177
H8 HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. v RIC DORMITORY (SG) PTE. LTD. & 3 Ors
10 July 2024
SGHC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.