Leading Tort Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

150 reported cases · January 2023 to July 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Tort?

Singapore courts issued 150 reported Tort judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (95), of the 44 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Claim dismissed (23), the median monetary award recorded was $50,625. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 150 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (38) · 2025 (43) · 2024 (34) · 2023 (35)
By court SGHC (95) · SGDC (22) · SGHC(A) (8) · SGMC (8) · SGCA (7) · SGHC(I) (4) · SGCA(I) (2) · SGCDT (2) · SGHCR (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (44 parseable) Claim dismissed (23) · Appeal dismissed (10) · Appeal allowed (8) · Application dismissed (1) · Claim allowed (1) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1)
Median monetary award $50,625 (across 6 awards)

Compiled from 150 reported Tort judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 150 reported Tort judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to July 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (15 cases), Lin Hui Yin Sharon is the most active lawyer (4 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Tort appears in 150 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit (25), Conspiracy (24) and Misrepresentation — Negligent misrepresentation (18). The most active judge by reported case count is Steven Chong (9 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (15 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Tort cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Tort with 15 cases between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (13 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (10 cases). 179 firms appeared in Tort cases during this period.

Who are the leading Tort lawyers in Singapore?

Lin Hui Yin Sharon is the most active Tort lawyer in Singapore with 4 case appearances between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Luo Ling Ling (3) and Saadhvika Jayanth (3).

Which judges handle the most Tort cases in Singapore?

Steven Chong has handled 9 Tort cases between January 2023 and July 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Mohamed Faizal (8 cases) and Belinda Ang Saw Ean (7 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Tort cases are reported in Singapore courts?

150 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Tort, most often decided by Steven Chong.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Tort cases?

The main sub-topics are Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit (25), Conspiracy (24) and Misrepresentation — Negligent misrepresentation (18).

Case Volume by Year

35
23
34
24
43
25
38
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 45 cases
cited in 17 cases
cited in 14 cases
Misrepresentation Act
cited in 12 cases
Defamation Act
cited in 9 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 5 cases
cited in 4 cases
cited in 4 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 4 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 4 cases
Penal Code (Cap 224)
cited in 3 cases
COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act
cited in 3 cases
Contributory Negligence and Personal Injuries Act
cited in 3 cases

Guides & Data

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 6 of 6
[2023] SGHC 264
SEATRIUM NEW ENERGY LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS KEPPEL FELS LIMITED) v HJ SHIPBUILDING & CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD.
20 September 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 257
LIM SEONG ONG & Anor v PANSHORE ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.
13 September 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC(I) 13
THE MICRO TELLERS NETWORK LIMITED & 3 Ors v CHENG YI HAN (ZHONG YIHAN) & 4 Ors
6 September 2023
SGHC(I)
[2023] SGHC 245
Voltas Limited v Ng Theng Swee & Anor
5 September 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 243
AXIS MEGALINK SDN BHD v FAR EAST MINING PTE LTD
31 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 221
Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan
14 August 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 171
David Haw Wan Sin & Anor v Wendy Kwek Siang Ling & 6 Ors
20 June 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 127
HECTOR FINANCE GROUP LIMITED & Anor v CHAN CHEW KEAK
26 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 156
DR. WHO WATERWORKS PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors v DR. WHO (M) SDN. BHD. & 3 Ors
26 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 154
Lawrence Li See Kit v Debate Association (Singapore)
23 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 139
Government of the City of Buenos Aires v HN Singapore Pte Ltd & Anor
12 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 124
LOW SING KHIANG v LOGICMILLS LEARNING CENTRE PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors
5 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 117
GRACE CHIA JUNE THEO (XIE YUNZHEN) MRS GRACE DONEY & 3 Ors v SELVAKUMAR RANJAN & Anor
3 May 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 104
2253 APPAREL INC v MEDICO TITAN PTE LTD
19 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 96
CHAN PIK SUN v WAN HOE KEET (WEN HAOJIE) & 3 Ors
14 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 89
RAFFLES EDUCATION CORPORATION LIMITED & 2 Ors v SHANTANU PRAKASH & Anor
6 April 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 80
LIANG XIHONG v LOONG SOO MIN & Anor
31 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 75
SALMIZAN BIN ABDULLAH v CRAPPER IAN ANTHONY
30 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 70
Pappa W/O Veeramuthu v NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES GROUP PTE. LTD.
29 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 53
CHENG HOE SOON v EZEKIEL PETER LATIMER formerly practicing in the style of M/S PETER EZEKIEL & CO
3 March 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 23
TRITECH WATER TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD. & Anor v DUAN WEI
22 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 39
DIALECTIC PR LLC v BRILLIANTE RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL PTE LIMITED & Anor
17 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 34
Shanghai Afute Food and Beverage Management Co. Ltd. v Tan Swee Meng & 2 Ors
15 February 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 13
Bay Lim Piang v Lye Cher Kang
19 January 2023
SGHC
[2023] SGHC 14
MAH KIAT SENG v ATTORNEY-GENERAL & 2 Ors
19 January 2023
SGHC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.