Leading Contract Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

226 reported cases · January 2023 to July 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Contract?

Singapore courts issued 226 reported Contract judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (147), of the 55 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (19), the median monetary award recorded was $72,500. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 226 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (43) · 2025 (54) · 2024 (56) · 2023 (73)
By court SGHC (147) · SGHC(A) (25) · SGDC (16) · SGCA (11) · SGHC(I) (9) · SGMC (7) · SGCA(I) (4) · SGSCT (4) · SGHCR (3)
Outcomes (55 parseable) Appeal dismissed (19) · Appeal allowed (14) · Claim dismissed (13) · Application dismissed (5) · Claim allowed (2) · Application granted (1) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1)
Median monetary award $72,500 (across 6 awards)
Most active counsel Chew Kei-Jin (3) · Devathas Satianathan (3) · Kiran Jessica Makwana (3) · Koh Swee Yen (3) · Lee Eng Beng (3)

Compiled from 226 reported Contract judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 226 reported Contract judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to July 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (29 cases), Koh Swee Yen is the most active lawyer (6 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Contract appears in 226 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Breach (49), Contractual terms (15) and Formation (13). The most active judge by reported case count is Woo Bih Li (17 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (29 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Contract cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Contract with 29 cases between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (24 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (20 cases). 230 firms appeared in Contract cases during this period.

Who are the leading Contract lawyers in Singapore?

Koh Swee Yen is the most active Contract lawyer in Singapore with 6 case appearances between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Lok Vi Ming (5) and Cheng Wai Yuen Mark (4).

Which judges handle the most Contract cases in Singapore?

Woo Bih Li has handled 17 Contract cases between January 2023 and July 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Kannan Ramesh (14 cases) and Goh Yihan (14 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Contract cases are reported in Singapore courts?

226 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Contract, most often decided by Woo Bih Li.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Contract cases?

The main sub-topics are Breach (49), Contractual terms (15) and Formation (13).

Case Volume by Year

73
23
56
24
54
25
43
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 56 cases
cited in 34 cases
cited in 24 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 15 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 15 cases
cited in 13 cases
Misrepresentation Act
cited in 11 cases
cited in 10 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 5 cases
cited in 4 cases
Unfair Contract Terms Act
cited in 4 cases
Moneylenders Act
cited in 4 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 3 of 10
[2025] SGMC 66
JAYARETHANAM S/O SINNIAH PILLAI v ABOITIZ DATA INNOVATION PTE. LTD.
28 October 2025
SGMC
[2025] SGHC 206
Lai Kai Jin Michael (Lai Kairen Michael) v Maybank Securities Pte. Ltd. & Anor
24 October 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGDC 267
THE BODY FIRM PTE LTD v SIOW SOON SIN & Anor
21 October 2025
SGDC
[2025] SGDC 278
DOTS N TOTS INTERIOR PTE.LTD. v LIEW YEW LIAN & Anor
17 October 2025
SGDC
[2025] SGHC 207
Circles Life Asia Technology Pte. Ltd. v Searchasia Consulting Pte. Ltd.
16 October 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 201
TUFFI (PTE.) LTD. v TECHKON PTE LTD & Anor
14 October 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGDC 268
De Beaute (SSC) Pte Ltd v Tan Mong Ngoh
8 October 2025
SGDC
[2025] SGHC 187
YANG QIANG & ANOR V GALLOP APAC PTE LTD & 5 ORS
30 September 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 190
Nanyang Commercial Management Pte Ltd v Matex International Limited
22 September 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(A) 16
KOK KUAN HWA v YAP WING SANG
9 September 2025
SGHC(A)
[2025] SGHC(A) 17
CENTRICORE (S) PTE. LTD. & 7 Ors v ATT SYSTEMS (S’PORE) PTE LTD & Anor
9 September 2025
SGHC(A)
[2025] SGCA 42
WINSON OIL TRADING PTE. LTD. v UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LIMITED
5 September 2025
SGCA
[2025] SGHC 170
DEEPAK MISHRA & Anor v RASHMI BOTHRA
26 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(A) 13
Jonathan William Glassberg v UBS AG, SINGAPORE BRANCH
22 August 2025
SGHC(A)
[2025] SGHC 168
SMART GLOVE INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD. v FULL SUPPORT HEALTHCARE LIMITED
22 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 163
DEUTSCHE BANK AG SINGAPORE BRANCH v ARJ HOLDING LIMITED & Anor
15 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 161
RICHARD CHEUNG TECK CHEONG & 15 Ors v LVND INVESTMENTS PTE. LTD.
14 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 160
KA SHIN TECHNOLOGIES (S) PTE LTD v TAN KIAT LIAN & 2 Ors
11 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 151
DMC v DMD
6 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 150
STRACO LEISURE PTE. LTD. v SUMITOMO (SHI) CYCLO DRIVE ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD.
5 August 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 146
JAMES YEO CHOON JIENG v TAN KER XIN & Anor
30 July 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 142
CREDIT SUISSE AG v Owner of the vessel(s) CHLOE V (IMO No. 9457452)
28 July 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 141
FEIDA BUS CONSORTIUM PTE. LTD. v ROYAL AUTOZ EXPORTER PTE. LTD.
18 July 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(I) 17
JULIAN MORENO BELTRAN & 9 Ors v TERRAFORM LABS PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors
7 July 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHC(A) 9
Thia Tiong Siong & 3 Ors v Pop Holdings Pte. Ltd.
4 July 2025
SGHC(A)

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.