Leading Contract Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

226 reported cases · January 2023 to July 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Contract?

Singapore courts issued 226 reported Contract judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (147), of the 55 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (19), the median monetary award recorded was $72,500. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 226 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (43) · 2025 (54) · 2024 (56) · 2023 (73)
By court SGHC (147) · SGHC(A) (25) · SGDC (16) · SGCA (11) · SGHC(I) (9) · SGMC (7) · SGCA(I) (4) · SGSCT (4) · SGHCR (3)
Outcomes (55 parseable) Appeal dismissed (19) · Appeal allowed (14) · Claim dismissed (13) · Application dismissed (5) · Claim allowed (2) · Application granted (1) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1)
Median monetary award $72,500 (across 6 awards)
Most active counsel Chew Kei-Jin (3) · Devathas Satianathan (3) · Kiran Jessica Makwana (3) · Koh Swee Yen (3) · Lee Eng Beng (3)

Compiled from 226 reported Contract judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 226 reported Contract judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to July 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (29 cases), Koh Swee Yen is the most active lawyer (6 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Contract appears in 226 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Breach (49), Contractual terms (15) and Formation (13). The most active judge by reported case count is Woo Bih Li (17 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (29 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Contract cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Contract with 29 cases between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Drew & Napier LLC (24 cases) and Allen & Gledhill LLP (20 cases). 230 firms appeared in Contract cases during this period.

Who are the leading Contract lawyers in Singapore?

Koh Swee Yen is the most active Contract lawyer in Singapore with 6 case appearances between January 2023 and July 2026, followed by Lok Vi Ming (5) and Cheng Wai Yuen Mark (4).

Which judges handle the most Contract cases in Singapore?

Woo Bih Li has handled 17 Contract cases between January 2023 and July 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Kannan Ramesh (14 cases) and Goh Yihan (14 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Contract cases are reported in Singapore courts?

226 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Contract, most often decided by Woo Bih Li.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Contract cases?

The main sub-topics are Breach (49), Contractual terms (15) and Formation (13).

Case Volume by Year

73
23
56
24
54
25
43
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 56 cases
cited in 34 cases
cited in 24 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 15 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 15 cases
cited in 13 cases
Misrepresentation Act
cited in 11 cases
cited in 10 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 7 cases
cited in 5 cases
cited in 4 cases
Unfair Contract Terms Act
cited in 4 cases
Moneylenders Act
cited in 4 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 4 of 10
[2025] SGHCR 21
Palyanitsa Ltd v Bridgetower Capital Ltd
4 July 2025
SGHCR
[2025] SGHC(A) 8
ROBERT TANTULAR v THE STEPHANIE KARINA
1 July 2025
SGHC(A)
[2025] SGHC 114
TRADESMEN PTE LTD v TEN-LEAGUE CORPORATIONS PTE. LTD.
24 June 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 109
KUVERA PROPERTIES PTE. LTD. v FAR EAST OPUS PTE. LTD.
10 June 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 86
Crystal Beauty Pte Ltd v Jasmine Xu & 4 Ors
8 May 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 84
CANSTONE MANAGEMENT LTD v ALLESTARI DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. & 6 Ors
6 May 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 75
CASTILLON SECURITY (S) PTE. LTD. v MUHAMMAD SHAUN ERIC BIN ABDULLAH
25 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(I) 12
DMF v DMG
17 April 2025
SGHC(I)
[2025] SGHC 64
CROWN CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD v UNIVEL HOSPITALITY PTE. LTD.
10 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 66
Pierre Andre Jacques Lorinet v Helu-Trans (S) Pte Ltd
10 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 63
REN XIN WU V LEE KUAN FUNG & ANOR
9 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 58
OREXIM TRADING LIMITED v MAHAVIR PORT AND TERMINAL PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 Ors
2 April 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 50
Valency International Pte Ltd v JSW International Tradecorp Pte Ltd & 2 Ors
28 March 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 41
HAYATE PARTNERS PTE. LTD. v RAJAN SUNIL KUMAR
14 March 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 40
SHIPWORKS ENGINEERING PTE LTD v SEMBCORP MARINE INTEGRATED YARD PTE LTD
13 March 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(A) 5
J. G. JEWELRY PTE. LTD. v SHREE RAMKRISHNA EXPORTS PVT. LTD. & 7 Ors
6 March 2025
SGHC(A)
[2025] SGDC 37
GOH KING KWEE & Anor v LIU SHU MING & 2 Ors
6 February 2025
SGDC
[2025] SGHC 19
KOK KUAN HWA v YAP WING SANG & 7 Ors
5 February 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 13
ATT SYSTEMS (S’PORE) PTE LTD & Anor v CENTRICORE (S) PTE. LTD. & 7 Ors
23 January 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 7
CHE'SOM BINTI ABDULLAH v QURRATU AIN BINTI MOHAMED YUSOPE
17 January 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 4
Jonathan William Glassberg v UBS AG, SINGAPORE BRANCH
10 January 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC(I) 1
MARKETLEND PTY LTD v QBE INSURANCE (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
8 January 2025
SGHC(I)
[2024] SGHC 330
CHIANG AI LING (JIANG AILING) v TAN KIAN CHYE & Anor
30 December 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 325
SHIPWORKS ENGINEERING PTE LTD v SEMBCORP MARINE INTEGRATED YARD PTE LTD
20 December 2024
SGHC
[2024] SGHC 318
DUKE BAKERY PTE. LTD. v LIN LIMING & 2 ORS
13 December 2024
SGHC

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.