Leading Tort Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

The High Court dismissed all of the claimant's claims and ordered him to pay the defendant's costs on the standard basis, to be taxed unless agreed, with liberty to apply for a different order.

The High Court dismissed Parastate's claim in its entirety, rejecting the claims in dishonest assistance, fraudulent misrepresentation and unlawful means conspiracy against Wang Li.

The court dismissed the claim in its entirety, finding neither breach of contract nor any proven representation.

The court allowed the claims in part.

The District Court dismissed all of the claimant's claims against the second defendant, and directed the parties, failing agreement on costs, to file costs submissions within 14 days.

The District Court dismissed the claim in full.

The High Court dismissed Parastate's claim in its entirety, rejecting the claims in dishonest assistance, fraudulent misrepresentation and unlawful means conspiracy against Wang Li.

The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.

The court allowed the claim in part.

The court allowed Award's counterclaim in part and rescinded the lease ab initio for Broadley's fraudulent misrepresentation.

The court dismissed the claim in its entirety, finding neither breach of contract nor any proven representation.

The District Court dismissed all of the claimant's claims against the second defendant, and directed the parties, failing agreement on costs, to file costs submissions within 14 days.

The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.

Tan Siong Thye SJ found Mr Lo liable for fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misstatement and conspiracy by unlawful means, and allowed the claim.

Mohamed Faizal JC dismissed the claim in full against both defendants, and directed submissions on costs if costs were not agreed.

The District Court dismissed all of the claimant's claims and allowed the counterclaim in part, ordering the claimant to pay $1,306.40 in outstanding berthing fees with contractual interest at 1.5%…

The court allowed the claim in part, finding the defendant liable but apportioning responsibility for the accident at 75% to the claimant and 25% to the defendant.

The High Court dismissed the claims in negligence against both NUH and AMKH, finding no breach of duty, and did not reach damages.

The District Court allowed the claim in part, entering interlocutory judgment that Mr John owed and breached his duty of care and that the trial on the remaining issues of liability and quantum…

The Magistrate's Court allowed the claim in part: it entered judgment against Eigen E&C for $545 with interest at 5.33% p.a., and dismissed the claim against Eigen Energy.

The court dismissed the action.

The High Court dismissed all of Mr Chua's claims.

District Judge Evans Ng allowed the claim on liability, holding the defendant negligent and wholly liable for the accident and finding no contributory negligence.

District Judge Tay Jingxi allowed the claim in part, awarding $13,664.13, made up of $4,314.13 under Invoice 22003 and $9,350 under Invoice 23004.

The District Court found that Mdm Nirmala failed to prove that APL breached its duty of care and dismissed her action.

The court allowed the claim in part, finding the defendant liable but apportioning responsibility for the accident at 75% to the claimant and 25% to the defendant.

The court allowed Award's counterclaim in part and rescinded the lease ab initio for Broadley's fraudulent misrepresentation.

The Magistrate's Court allowed the claim, entering judgment for Huttons for $28,080, being $26,000 plus the then-prevailing GST, dismissed the defendant's counterclaim, and directed written…

Kristy Tan J dismissed the claimants' negligence claim and dismissed Ms Loh's third party claim against the bank.

The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal in its entirety and upheld the dismissal of all three claims.

The District Court dismissed both the claim and the counterclaim.

The High Court dismissed the claim in its entirety.

Mohamed Faizal JC allowed the claim in part.

The High Court dismissed the claimants' claims and also dismissed McKee's counterclaim.

The court allowed the claim in part: it dismissed Valency's claims against JSW and Oldendorff and granted judgment for Valency against Unicorn for conversion of 38,000MT in the sum of USD2,694,451…

The District Court dismissed the claim in full.

The Magistrate's Court allowed the claim in part, granting judgment for the claimant for a total of $8,000 in general damages on four of the posts, with post-judgment interest at 5.33% per annum.

The court allowed the claim in part.

The District Court dismissed the claim in full.

The District Court dismissed the claim.

The court allowed the claims in part.

Mohamed Faizal JC allowed the claim in part.

Mohamed Faizal JC allowed the liquidators' claims in part.

The High Court allowed the claim in part, finding Mr Ong in breach of his fiduciary duties and his company liable in knowing receipt, with both liable in unlawful means conspiracy.

Hri Kumar Nair J allowed the claims in part.

The court allowed the claim in part, awarding $8,989.55 on a 100% basis before apportionment of liability: $2,000 for the neck injury, $750 for the right hand injury, $1,500 for the minor head…

Deputy Registrar Don Ho allowed the claim in part, awarding general damages of $9,800 and special damages of $3353.71 with the usual consequential orders.

The District Court allowed the claim in part, awarding damages only for injuries and losses the evidence showed were caused by the 2014 accident: S$10,000 in general damages (S$3,000 for abrasions…

The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal in its entirety and upheld the dismissal of all three claims.

Chan Seng Onn SJ dismissed KST's claim against the estate and, as a result, the estate's claims against the three third parties.

The District Court allowed the claim in part.

The District Court dismissed all of the claimant's claims and allowed the counterclaim in part, ordering the claimant to pay $1,306.40 in outstanding berthing fees with contractual interest at 1.5%…

Audrey Lim J allowed Mr Kanan's claim only in part.

Chan Seng Onn SJ dismissed KST's claim against the estate and, as a result, the estate's claims against the three third parties.

The court allowed the claim in part: it dismissed Valency's claims against JSW and Oldendorff and granted judgment for Valency against Unicorn for conversion of 38,000MT in the sum of USD2,694,451…

The District Court dismissed the claim in full.

The District Court dismissed the claimant's action, finding that the complaint was defamatory but that the defence of qualified privilege succeeded and express malice was not proved.

The District Court dismissed the claim in full.

The District Court dismissed the claim.

The High Court dismissed the claimants' claims and also dismissed McKee's counterclaim.

The court dismissed the action.

Kristy Tan J dismissed the claimants' negligence claim and dismissed Ms Loh's third party claim against the bank.

The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal in its entirety and upheld the dismissal of all three claims.

Mohamed Faizal JC dismissed the claim in full against both defendants, and directed submissions on costs if costs were not agreed.

The court dismissed Mr Glassberg's claim for damages and interest in full, finding against him on authority, contract, tort, the Unfair Contract Terms Act and vicarious liability.

The District Court dismissed the claim in full.

The Magistrate's Court allowed the claim in part, granting judgment for the claimant for a total of $8,000 in general damages on four of the posts, with post-judgment interest at 5.33% per annum.

The District Court dismissed the claim in full.

The District Judge dismissed the claim against both defendants because the claimant had not proved that either of them was responsible for publishing the statements.

The court allowed Mr Modi's appeal in part and awarded him costs here and below.

The court allowed the claim in part, finding the defendant liable but apportioning responsibility for the accident at 75% to the claimant and 25% to the defendant.

The High Court allowed the appeal in part, re-apportioning responsibility at 75% to the appellant and 25% to the respondent rather than the 75% to the respondent the appellant sought, and reserved…

The High Court allowed the claim on liability and ordered interlocutory judgment for Ms Booi on the basis that Mr Lee was fully liable for the accident, finding no contributory negligence.

The court dismissed Mr Glassberg's claim for damages and interest in full, finding against him on authority, contract, tort, the Unfair Contract Terms Act and vicarious liability.

Dedar Singh Gill J allowed the appeal and ordered judgment for the appellant against the three respondents jointly and severally for 90% of damages to be assessed, with costs to be heard separately.

The District Court dismissed the claimant's action, finding that the complaint was defamatory but that the defence of qualified privilege succeeded and express malice was not proved.

The District Court dismissed the claim.

The District Court dismissed the action, finding that neither the claim in defamation nor the claim in malicious falsehood was made out, and directed written submissions on costs limited to ten pages…

The High Court dismissed Mr Bagga's claims in defamation and malicious falsehood.

The court allowed the claim in part.

The court refused to award damages.

The court allowed the Lims' appeal in part and dismissed Dways' appeal.

The High Court dismissed Mr Bagga's claims in defamation and malicious falsehood.

The court allowed the claim in part.

The District Court dismissed the claim in full.

The District Court dismissed the claim.

The High Court dismissed the claimants' claims and also dismissed McKee's counterclaim.

The court dismissed both Originating Claim No 226 of 2024 and Originating Claim No 468 of 2023 in their entirety, finding the Goldciti engagement genuine and no implied term or directly owed duty in…

By a majority (Steven Chong JCA and Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD, Woo Bih Li JAD dissenting), the court allowed the appeal in part.

Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J dismissed the plaintiffs' oppression and conspiracy claims in their entirety.

The court dismissed all of Sandra's claims, including those she had earlier withdrawn, and awarded the defendants costs to be assessed if not agreed.

The District Court dismissed all of the claimant's claims and allowed the counterclaim in part, ordering the claimant to pay $1,306.40 in outstanding berthing fees with contractual interest at 1.5%…

The District Court dismissed the claim.

Dedar Singh Gill J allowed the plaintiffs' claims in part: the infringement and passing off claims succeeded in part, with an inquiry as to damages (or an account of profits) and an injunction, and…

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal.

Lee Seiu Kin J dismissed the owner's claim, with costs to be heard.

The tribunal allowed the application for a special direction.

The tribunal dismissed the claim because the claimant had not proved that the respondent was the source of any excessive noise.

The High Court allowed Mr Mah's claim in part.

The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the striking out of the claims against Mr Ong and the refusal of the amendment and of the joinder of Java Asset, since the revised statement of claim…

Hri Kumar Nair J dismissed both appeals at the end of the hearing, leaving the striking out of Kapital's claim against Andrew and Stephanie in place.

The High Court dismissed the counterclaimants' counterclaims in both unlawful means and lawful means conspiracy, and in misrepresentation, against all six defendants in counterclaim.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that the claims were barred by the extended doctrine of res judicata and were an abuse of process.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal.

Lee Seiu Kin J allowed the claim in part.

The court allowed the bank's application and struck out the originating claim and statement of claim in their entirety as an abuse of process.

The District Judge dismissed the claim, finding that the claimant had failed to prove that the defendant breached its duty of care, so the remaining issues did not need to be decided.

The Appellate Division, by a majority, dismissed the appeal on liability, quantum and costs, and ordered the appellant to pay costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements.

The High Court allowed the claim in part.

The High Court dismissed the claimants' claims and also dismissed McKee's counterclaim.

The District Court dismissed the action, finding that neither the claim in defamation nor the claim in malicious falsehood was made out, and directed written submissions on costs limited to ten pages…

The High Court dismissed the claimants' claims and also dismissed McKee's counterclaim.

The High Court dismissed Mr Bagga's claims in defamation and malicious falsehood.

Hri Kumar Nair J found the defendants liable on almost all of the claims, so the claim was allowed in part.

The High Court found for Petrotech and allowed its claims.

The High Court allowed Feida's claim in part, only to the extent of $814 for the stamp duty and penalty Feida had paid under cl 24, which Royal Autoz conceded it owed.

The court dismissed Mr Lorinet's claims.