Leading Civil Procedure Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore

466 reported cases · January 2023 to June 2026

Updated

What did Singapore courts decide in Civil Procedure?

Singapore courts issued 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments between 2023–2026, most in SGHC (242), of the 127 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (39), the median monetary award recorded was $16,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.

Reported cases 466 (2023–2026)
By year 2026 (81) · 2025 (117) · 2024 (125) · 2023 (143)
By court SGHC (242) · SGHCR (76) · SGHC(I) (40) · SGHC(A) (39) · SGCA (32) · SGDC (15) · SGHCF (10) · SGCA(I) (6) · SGMC (4) · SGFC (1) · SGSCT (1)
Outcomes (127 parseable) Appeal dismissed (39) · Appeal allowed (37) · Application dismissed (32) · Application allowed (7) · Application granted (4) · Claim dismissed (4) · Claim allowed (2) · Judgment for the plaintiff (1) · Judgment for the respondent (1)
Median monetary award $16,000 (across 12 awards)
Most active counsel Charlene Wee Swee Ting (9) · Thio Shen Yi (9) · Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen (8) · Ong Boon Hwee William (8) · T Abirami (8)

Compiled from 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.

Outcome data updated

Across 466 reported Civil Procedure judgments in Singapore courts (January 2023 to June 2026), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (61 cases), Thio Shen Yi is the most active lawyer (13 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.

Overview

Civil Procedure appears in 466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026). The most common sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14). The most active judge by reported case count is Goh Yihan (45 cases) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (61 cases).

Which law firms handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Civil Procedure with 61 cases between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by WongPartnership LLP (52 cases) and Drew & Napier LLC (44 cases). 293 firms appeared in Civil Procedure cases during this period.

Who are the leading Civil Procedure lawyers in Singapore?

Thio Shen Yi is the most active Civil Procedure lawyer in Singapore with 13 case appearances between January 2023 and June 2026, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (11) and Charlene Wee Swee Ting (10).

Which judges handle the most Civil Procedure cases in Singapore?

Goh Yihan has handled 45 Civil Procedure cases between January 2023 and June 2026, the most of any Singapore judge. Choo Han Teck (41 cases) and Steven Chong (26 cases) are also among the most active.

How many Civil Procedure cases are reported in Singapore courts?

466 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026) involve Civil Procedure, most often decided by Goh Yihan.

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Civil Procedure cases?

The main sub-topics are Striking out (28), Costs (24) and Stay of proceedings (14).

Case Volume by Year

143
23
125
24
117
25
81
26
2023–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Key Statutes

cited in 106 cases
cited in 57 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 50 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 49 cases
cited in 48 cases
cited in 45 cases
cited in 41 cases
cited in 29 cases
cited in 23 cases
cited in 18 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 11 cases
cited in 9 cases
cited in 8 cases
Trustees Act (Cap 337)
cited in 7 cases

Court Distribution

Cases

Page 1 of 19
[2026] SGSCT 19
JIH v JII & Anor
30 June 2026
SGSCT
[2026] SGHC(I) 6
DVA & Anor v DVC
19 June 2026
SGHC(I)
[2026] SGHC 130
Ong Cheng Cheng v Attorney-General
17 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 131
SHAW TOWERS REALTY (PTE) LIMITED v Chief Assessor
17 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 126
EQUATION RECYCLING PTE. LTD. v LEADING BIO-ENERGY (S) PTE. LTD.
15 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHCR 19
Paresh Tribhovan Jotangia & 3 Ors v Singapore Commodities Group Co., Pte. Ltd. & Anor
12 June 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 124
EXCHANGE UNION COMPANY & 3 Ors v WO QI & 11 Ors
12 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 125
EC-COUNCIL PTE LTD v WPP SINGAPORE PTE LTD
12 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHCR 21
MARSH (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. v ALARIC LEE
10 June 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHC 123
ANURAG AVULA & Anor v MATCHMOVE PAY PTE LTD
10 June 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGDC 195
Nirmala D/O Thangavellu v Acestes Pte. Ltd.
9 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGDC 190
CARLSON CLARK SMITH v GOH HIN CALM & 5 Ors
8 June 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHCR 18
LATERAL SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) v RAYMOND LOW TUCK LOONG
8 June 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGHCF 18
YET v YEU
4 June 2026
SGHCF
[2026] SGHC 119
DXB v DXC
29 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 134
TWITTER ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD. v MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA
25 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 112
Djony Gunawan v Christina Lesmana
22 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 111
FRANK LEE v INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH & 9 Ors
21 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHCR 17
ESAVE AG v ESAVE APAC PTE. LTD. & 3 Ors
18 May 2026
SGHCR
[2026] SGDC 168
Keystone Law Corporation v Ee Kwong Rong, Clement
15 May 2026
SGDC
[2026] SGHC 104
FAUZIYAH BINTE MOHD AHBIDIN (EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MOHAMED AHBIDEEN BIN MOHAMED KASSIM @ AHNA MOHAMED ZAINAL ABIDIN BIN KASSIM) & Anor v MAJLIS UGAMA ISLAM SINGAPURA
14 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC 103
HU YINAN V PEH CHIN HUA & 2 ORS
14 May 2026
SGHC
[2026] SGHC(A) 16
Capajet Pte. Ltd. v EV Technology Pte. Ltd. & 3 Ors
14 May 2026
SGHC(A)
[2026] SGCA 26
DRH v DRI
13 May 2026
SGCA
[2026] SGHCR 15
LAGUNA NATIONAL GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) & 2 Ors v Peter Kwee Seng Chio & 3 Ors
13 May 2026
SGHCR

Methodology & disclaimer

Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.